The Jean Monnet Working Papers > 2008 Jean Monnet Papers


No.06/08

Author: Jürgen Kurtz

Title: Adjudging the Exceptional at International Law: Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis

Abstract:

This paper examines the impact of international law on the ability of states to mitigate the effects of financial crises.  It focuses on the invocation of investment treaty disciplines in the aftermath of the 2001-2 Argentine financial crisis and the adjudication of Argentina’s defence of a state of necessity, under both subject treaties and at customary international law.  The paper uncovers three interpretative methods in the jurisprudence on the relationship between the treaty exception and customary plea of necessity: methodologies I (confluence), II (lex specialis) and III (primary-secondary applications).  Method I is the dominant approach in the jurisprudence and the most restrictive of the three readings.  The paper argues that method I is mistaken both on a careful interpretation of the two legal standards and on a broader historical analysis of the emergence of investment treaty norms.  Given these substantive flaws, the paper isolates the motivations to account for the popularity of this method through a close reading of the awards.  These reveal continuing tensions in the field, not least the problematic suggestion that a single value of protection should exclusively inform our understanding of the purpose of investment treaties.  These sociological features of investor-state arbitration should, it is suggested, inform our choice on other interpretative methods.  This comes down to an election between methods II (lex specialis) and III (primary-secondary applications).  Method III is the most convincing and coherent reading of the relationship between the two legal standards. The paper concludes by offering a framework to address the key interpretative questions implicated in that method: (i) the identification and scope of the notion of “public order” and a state’s “essential security interests”; and (ii) the appropriate test of “necessity” or means-end scrutiny.

Download: PDF * | DOC**

This paper is also published as IILJ Working Paper 2008/6. 

 


* The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.

** rtf is a (more or less) universally readable format. Just download the file, which can be opened in most word processors.

   
 
Browse
 
Home
2007
Order Hard Copies
Search the Paper Series
How to cite the Papers
Help with Printing the Papers
 
Top

Last updated on November 11, 2008